“Wear green on St. Patrick’s Day or get pinched.” That pretty much
sums up the Irish-American “curriculum” that I learned when I was in
school. Yes, I recall a nod to the so-called Potato Famine, but it was
mentioned only in passing.
To
support the famine relief effort, British tax policy required landlords
to pay the local taxes of their poorest tenant farmers, leading many
landlords to forcibly evict struggling farmers and destroy their
cottages in order to save money. From Hunger on Trial Teaching Activity.
Sadly, today’s high school textbooks continue to largely ignore the
famine, despite the fact that it was responsible for unimaginable
suffering and the deaths of more than a million Irish peasants, and that
it triggered the greatest wave of Irish immigration in U.S. history.
Nor do textbooks make any attempt to help students link famines past and
present.
Yet there is no shortage of material that can bring these dramatic
events to life in the classroom. In my own high school social studies
classes, I begin with Sinead O’Connor’s haunting rendition of
“Skibbereen,” which includes the verse:
… Oh it’s well I do remember, that bleak
December day,
The landlord and the sheriff came, to drive
Us all away
They set my roof on fire, with their cursed
English spleen
And that’s another reason why I left old
Skibbereen.
By contrast, Holt McDougal’s U.S. history textbook The Americans,
devotes a flat two sentences to “The Great Potato Famine.” Prentice
Hall’s America: Pathways to the Present fails to offer a single quote
from the time. The text calls the famine a “horrible disaster,” as if it
were a natural calamity like an earthquake. And in an awful single
paragraph, Houghton Mifflin’s The Enduring Vision: A History of the
American People blames the “ravages of famine” simply on “a blight,” and
the only contemporaneous quote comes, inappropriately, from a landlord,
who describes the surviving tenants as “famished and ghastly
skeletons.” Uniformly, social studies textbooks fail to allow the Irish
to speak for themselves, to narrate their own horror.
These timid slivers of knowledge not only deprive students of rich
lessons in Irish-American history, they exemplify much of what is wrong
with today’s curricular reliance on corporate-produced textbooks.
First, does anyone really think that students will remember anything
from the books’ dull and lifeless paragraphs? Today’s textbooks contain
no stories of actual people. We meet no one, learn nothing of anyone’s
life, encounter no injustice, no resistance. This is a curriculum bound
for boredom. As someone who spent almost 30 years teaching high school
social studies, I can testify that students will be unlikely to seek to
learn more about events so emptied of drama, emotion, and humanity.
Nor do these texts raise any critical questions for students to
consider. For example, it’s important for students to learn that the
crop failure in Ireland affected only the potato—during the worst famine
years, other food production was robust. Michael Pollan notes in The
Botany of Desire, “Ireland’s was surely the biggest experiment in
monoculture ever attempted and surely the most convincing proof of its
folly.” But if only this one variety of potato, the Lumper, failed, and
other crops thrived, why did people starve?
Thomas Gallagher points out in Paddy’s Lament, that during the first
winter of famine, 1846-47, as perhaps 400,000 Irish peasants starved,
landlords exported 17 million pounds sterling worth of grain, cattle,
pigs, flour, eggs, and poultry—food that could have prevented those
deaths. Throughout the famine, as Gallagher notes, there was an
abundance of food produced in Ireland, yet the landlords exported it to
markets abroad.
The school curriculum could and should ask students to reflect on the
contradiction of starvation amidst plenty, on the ethics of food
exports amidst famine. And it should ask why these patterns persist into
our own time.
More than a century and a half after the “Great Famine,” we live with
similar, perhaps even more glaring contradictions. Raj Patel opens his
book, Stuffed and Starved: Markets, Power and the Hidden Battle for the
World’s Food System: “Today, when we produce more food than ever before,
more than one in ten people on Earth are hungry. The hunger of 800
million happens at the same time as another historical first: that they
are outnumbered by the one billion people on this planet who are
overweight.”
Patel’s book sets out to account for “the rot at the core of the
modern food system.” This is a curricular journey that our students
should also be on — reflecting on patterns of poverty, power, and
inequality that stretch from 19th century Ireland to 21st century
Africa, India, Appalachia, and Oakland; that explore what happens when
food and land are regarded purely as commodities in a global system of
profit.
But today’s corporate textbook-producers are no more interested in
feeding student curiosity about this inequality than were British
landlords interested in feeding Irish peasants. Take Pearson, the global
publishing giant. At its website, the corporation announces
(redundantly) that “we measure our progress against three key measures:
earnings, cash and return on invested capital.” The Pearson empire had
2011 worldwide sales of more than $9 billion—that’s nine thousand
million dollars, as I might tell my students. Multinationals like
Pearson have no interest in promoting critical thinking about an
economic system whose profit-first premises they embrace with gusto.
As mentioned, there is no absence of teaching materials on the Irish
famine that can touch head and heart. In a role play, “Hunger on Trial,”
that I wrote and taught to my own students in Portland, Oregon—included
at the Zinn Education Project website— students investigate who or what
was responsible for the famine. The British landlords, who demanded
rent from the starving poor and exported other food crops? The British
government, which allowed these food exports and offered scant aid to
Irish peasants? The Anglican Church, which failed to denounce selfish
landlords or to act on behalf of the poor? A system of distribution,
which sacrificed Irish peasants to the logic of colonialism and the
capitalist market?
These are rich and troubling ethical questions. They are exactly the
kind of issues that fire students to life and allow them to see that
history is not simply a chronology of dead facts stretching through
time.
So go ahead: Have a Guinness, wear a bit of green, and put on the
Chieftains. But let’s honor the Irish with our curiosity. Let’s make
sure that our schools show some respect, by studying the social forces
that starved and uprooted over a million Irish—and that are starving and
uprooting people today.
Copyright 2014 Zinn Education Project
Bill Bigelow taught high school social studies in Portland, Ore. for almost 30 years. He is the curriculum editor of
Rethinking Schools and the co-director of the
Zinn Education Project.
This project offers free materials to teach people’s history and an “If
We Knew Our History” article series. Bigelow is author or co-editor of
numerous books, including
A People’s History for the Classroom and
The Line Between Us: Teaching About the Border and Mexican Immigration.
“Wear green on St. Patrick’s Day or get pinched.” That pretty much sums up the Irish-American “curriculum” that I learned when I was in school. Yes, I recall a nod to the so-called Potato Famine, but it was mentioned only in passing. You'll never hear a word of it from Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan or Rep. Peter King, Long Island’s longtime Republican congressman (and IRA supporter)...
ReplyDelete